Skip to main content Scroll Top

Agile People Live Longer!

agile-people-live-longer-2

A Great Need for Change, Increasing Complexity, and Declining Productivity in R&D

The demands on companies are growing: software-centric development, artificial intelligence, cultural change, and increasing global competition are pushing R&D organizations to their limits. Today, innovation must be faster, more customer-focused, and more cost-effective—but this often doesn’t align with existing, rigid structures.

What’s going wrong?

1. Complexity: Projects are delayed, budgets spiral out of control, and quality issues are on the rise.​

2. Resource utilization: Shortages of subject-matter experts and efficiency losses due to highly parallel task processing in a complex project landscape.​

3. Silo mentality: A lack of collaboration and misguided incentives prevent a seamless value stream.​

4. Hierarchy: Rigid hierarchical structures slow down decision-making.

Image1 AgileLifeLonger

Higher customer satisfaction results from involving customers early and regularly, as well as identifying customer needs in the early stages of product development. Not only is the customer-centric identification of product requirements through use cases for the user application valuable and effective, but so are methods such as design thinking and user involvement. Likewise, customer process monitoring can lead to valuable new approaches. In this process, the customer is not asked questions but is observed in order to better understand their usage process and identify issues that can be resolved through new product features or functions. In an agile setting, customers are also regularly involved in demos and reviews to process direct feedback immediately in the early stages and enable prioritization. Ultimately, these efforts result in a customer-centric approach that significantly increases the product’s success.

In complex technical development projects, one of the biggest challenges is having the right experts available at the right time during the project. That’s why there’s usually a project plan in which resources are planned and allocated. However, since many projects are being managed simultaneously and changes often need to be accommodated due to volatility, the planning—to put it mildly—is usually less than ideal. Furthermore, the belief in a plan often outweighs the realization that one must react quickly to changes. ​
In scaled agile product development, projects are not managed based on optimal employee utilization, but rather on the optimal output of the development organization. This means that immediate support is provided to every project along the critical path. This ensures that projects that are started can actually be completed as quickly as possible. This speed, in turn, creates room for new projects. Therefore, speed takes precedence over parallelism, and output takes precedence over utilization. As a result, productivity increases.

When projects are completed faster, development costs are generally optimized as well. Thanks to improved communication within the project—achieved through the timing of events, iterations (sprints), and improvement cycles (retros)—the system is self-improving. As employees take on more responsibility, decision-making speeds up—specifically where the information is. Employees get into the flow and become more satisfied, which in turn boosts team performance. We’re in an upward spiral! With well-scaled product development, an overall higher output of projects will soon follow the introductory phase, enabling more products and developments that generate revenue and contribution margin.

Image2 Living Longer Agile

We offer comprehensive solutions for the three most important stages of agile product development in the industry, with a focus on full-scale agile organizations.

Following successful pilot projects, the next step is typically to scale up the size of the projects and the scope of the departments involved. This means that larger projects involving many teams, as well as multiple projects running in parallel and various functional departments, are also brought into the agile framework. This has far-reaching implications for the work model, system architecture, capacity planning, and the role model. Work tools are also typically adapted.

In this phase, in addition to the elements mentioned above, project portfolio planning and the organizational structure are also considered. The goal is to better align corporate objectives, product strategies, and the project roadmap. At the core of this is an agile (comparative) evaluation process designed to prioritize the right projects while keeping the effort involved as low as possible. To ensure that new projects can be launched efficiently, they are developed during an “Excellent Preparation Phase” to the point where they can be “pulled” (not “pushed”) into the development pipeline at any time. It is also important to adapt the organization to optimally support the new working model and avoid silo thinking.

Image 5 Living Agile Longer

Based on a target vision, we implement the SAFe framework and tailor it specifically to your organization’s needs

5. Fundamental Principles​
Managers are evolving into servant leaders who help their employees take on more personal responsibility and build confidence. An agile mindset helps focus on customer value and makes lean development “good enough”—even if that means taking an unconventional approach at times.​